"Interdependence is and ought to be as much the ideal of man as self-sufficiency. Man is a social being." -Mohandas Gandhi
Tuesday, February 15, 2011
Valentine's Day
1) The extreme commercialism surrounding the holiday
2) Not having anyone to celebrate with
3) Increased pressure to be exceptionally romantic
Over the past week I've heard various themes on these arguments, often involving more than one of the above causes for anguish. While I can commiserate with the plight of those who are lonely, commitment-phobic, disillusioned, and poor, I can't help but think all of these issues come from over-thinking and not from the holiday itself.
Case in point: I had a lovely Valentine's Day. I'm single and received no flowers or chocolates from anyone. However, I did not hole up in my apartment lamenting the fact. I went to City Bakery and had delightful "love potion" hot chocolate with good friends who helped me stuff valentine cards for a party I went to afterwards. At the party, I ate dinner with my hands tied to my two nearest companions (a difficult but entertaining feat). I spent time with friends, talked about the importance of telling our loved ones (family, friends, lovers...) that we love them and showing it, and ate delicious food.
I had a fabulous time and returned home happy. To those of you who suffered through the holiday this year, I put forth this challenge: Next year, don't take things so seriously. Do something silly and spend time with the people you love (or just like a lot). If commercialism bothers you, bake some cookies. Unless you truly hate the idea of love or have absolutely no one in your life for whom you have fond feelings, there is no reason to dread the celebration of it.
Go out and love somebody.
Wednesday, February 9, 2011
Bathtub Stories
Surely you can see the resemblance and understand why I found this slightly unnerving. Why would anyone shape a tub like a coffin? Have the architects never seen Psycho? Do they not know that I already feel a sense of paranoia in the shower and that making such a distasteful visual reference only serves to increase that paranoia?
Seeking to justify the design, I lay down in the tub to see whether the wider width near the top was in any way helpful to the bathing process. As the tub is only 4 feet long, I found that it is not. I am forced to conclude that the makers of my bathtub have a sick sense of humor and want me to feel as though I'm being invited to sleep with the fishes (or, perhaps more fittingly, with the rubber duckies) on a regular basis.
Monday, March 15, 2010
Spring Breaking and Nostalgia
Ate breakfast: leftover rolls with jam. Mmmm, nutritious
Worked on my iTunes library...for quite awhile (thanks for the music, Sarah)
Facebooked
Removed my chipped nail polish
Now I'm thinking it's about time for lunch. I did manage, in the course of my iTunes/Facebook activities, to reconnect with a friend I haven't seen since I was 11--when I moved from a tiny town in Southern Utah back to the paradise of Southern California. Now, living in New York City (somewhat less temperate, and far more inhabited than either of the above locales), I don't even know how to approach talking to people I knew in the 5th grade. I have little recollection of what I was like then, but I seem to remember that being my rebellious stage. I don't know that I can really back that up except to say that I swore more at that age than I would like to admit to now, and I routinely rode my bike out past the city limits with a couple of other girls to visit a farm we had no business visiting. I read Stephen King, watched as many R-rated horror movies as I could get my hands on (though, in retrospect, many of the movies I thought were rated R were actually PG-13), and watched MTV at the house of the aforementioned friend. Yeah...I was a pretty bad kid. Luckily my mom never found out.
At the only elementary school in town, with only two classes for each grade, there was some definite social stratification going on, and not finding myself quite at the top, I rooted myself safely in the middle. I can only assume that that's where this friend of mine lived and stayed long after I made my departure. She was pretty, but edgy. I loved her white-blonde hair, and the only inside joke of ours that I can remember now was about trading mine for hers. In my nostalgia, I think of her as the pre-teen version of Claire Danes from My So Called Life. Now, even though I can't remember who was above or below us on that social ladder, it still frames my perceptions of myself and my friends at the time. I recognize that I am a different person, but in my mind, she is just a taller version of her 11-year-old self. Facebook stepped in this morning to tell me that she also has a four-year-old son, but other than that, she must be exactly the same.
Friday, March 12, 2010
American Misogynism
In college, I felt like all of my favorite professors were men, but looking back, I'm not so sure that's right. I had a female teacher for Postmodern American lit who I quite liked, actually. She's probably one of the biggest reasons I decided to go on to graduate school. I had a female humanities teacher who I didn't mind much. All of my Spanish teachers were female and I found them all unequivocally likable. I really only had one female teacher who I disliked, and I attributed my disliking her to her being female and trying somehow to make up for something that didn't need making up for. I felt like she was overbearing and horrible, in addition to being incredibly disorganized (which is by far my least favorite trait in a teacher), mostly because she felt like she had to be as difficult as the male teachers--prove that her gender had no effect on her teaching style, that the nurturing mother in her would not affect her ability to grade students justly, and so she overcorrected by setting impossibly high expectations, overworking her students, and grading on the harsh side.
In retrospect, those things may have had nothing at all to do with her gender. I recognize that, logically, but I can't really feel it. Are women simply harsher judges of other women than they are on men. Is it just me? Or does American society depict women as overbearing and needy, creating frustration with my own gender when someone actually fits into that mold. What are our expectations of men in modern society? Looking at pop culture, especially sitcoms, would indicate that we expect them to be bumbling buffoons, slow to take things seriously and in serious need of a female influence to balance them out (e.g. Everybody Loves Raymond, King of Queens, King of the Hill, The Simpsons, Friends). As a result (?) I don't expect much at all from men beyond a good sense of humor, which is perhaps why I find them less intimidating than women.
Is society's depiction of gender unfair? or is it really a reflection of gender norms? Is my analysis accurate? or am I really just projecting my own prejudices onto the culture? Food for thought.
Sunday, November 15, 2009
Why Women Carry Purses (And Men Don't)

Walking down the street in lower Manhattan one is often caught in a stream of pedestrians--a line of solitary figures in suits, their sex easily distinguishable by one detail: women carry purses, and men do not. It may seem obvious to some (if it does to you, please feel free to stop reading), but the question this brings to my mind is why don't men carry purses? How do they know they have everything they need when they leave the house? Do they often go through the day wishing they had carried something with them that they simply couldn't shove into their pockets or stand to carry? I cannot count the number of times male friends have asked me to carry things for them: cameras, phones, glasses, etc. etc., yet they never seem concerned with being able to carry these things themselves. Why not?
Most of us have seen the episode of friends where Joey, dressed and accessorized by Rachel, carries a "murse" to an audition and is berated incessantly for it by nearly everyone he meets. The bag was not frilly, but still the fact that he carried it supposedly feminized him. Here I will propose three possibly reasons why:
1. Men are simple whereas women are complicated and perhaps a bit high maintenance. All men really need to have with them is a wallet, keys, and a phone, and all of those things fit quite easily into pockets making any extra baggage unnecessary. A woman, on the other hand, must have a hair brush, lotion, blush, lipstick, gloss, a mirror, hand sanitizer, and a plethora of other items that a man would have no need for or would never think of carrying with him at all times in addition to the wallet, keys, and phone. And since women are forever image conscious, they must have a bag that not only fits all of those things they find it necessary to lug around, but it also must be fashionable (often meaning nothing more than that it must cost an arm and a leg).
2. Men's clothing is made to accommodate the necessities of life whereas women's clothing is not. Men's jeans and jackets have pockets designed specifically to hold wallets, etc. If you need to carry a pen and a checkbook, just put on a blazer, and you get an inside pocket to stow them conveniently on your person.
Women's clothing is not so practical. Very few clothing items worn by women have functional pockets. Women's jeans are made to fit close to the body, making it so that any item placed in the pockets protrudes and ruins the effect. In fact, many pockets on women's jackets and pants are there for purely aesthetic reasons, some not extending more than an inch so that it's nearly impossible to place in them anything larger than a single coin. A hat I own has a buttoned pocket on the side which I never paid any attention to until someone asked me what I kept in it. The question was obviously asked in jest, but it made me wonder nonetheless. All of these useless pockets make it necessary for women to find another way to carry their things, and the purse is the perfect solution.
3. Women are the designated caretakers of society, and men need taking care of. I once went out to eat with a guy who asked if I had hand sanitizer in my bag, and when I told him I didn't, he seemed utterly taken aback and put out that he would have to find a bathroom wherein he could wash his hands. As a matter of course, I made sure to put my Purell back in my bag as soon as I got home, feeling a bit embarrassed that I had been so ill-prepared. In addition to that, I am also called on regularly to provide gum, tissues, pens, lotion, chapstick, an umbrella, and even a mirror on occasion for others in my company. I have no idea how I would accomplish all of that without the use of a purse. In college I often teased a friend of mine who carried a "mother-bag" which contained everything one might need in any given situation, but now I find myself emulating her level of preparation, and I only find it strange that men who've grown up going through boy-scouts with the boy-scout motto, "Be Prepared," can go through life as adults looking for someone else to provide all of the things women routinely carry around.
That's all I've got for now, but I think there's room for discussion. Why do you carry a bag around? or Why don't you?
Wednesday, November 4, 2009
11-Year-Old Gives Birth on Her Wedding Day

While scanning through news stories this afternoon, I came across this story. An 11-year-old girl in Bulgaria gave birth to a baby girl over the weekend, in the middle of her three-day wedding ceremony.
The girl met her 19-year-old husband a few weeks before her 11th birthday, when she was being bullied by a group of kids on the playground. He intervened, rescued her from the bullies, and later, she asked him out on a date, and a week later she was pregnant.
Now the girl says she will "stop playing with toys--I have a new toy now," and "I have to grow up, she is the child now--I will not go back to school.
While the father, who is facing up to 6 years in prison for having sex with a minor, says, “We know that having a baby is a big responsibility. My wife is young but I will make sure that I look after both of them if the law allows me.”
There are so many issues wrapped up in this story--the fact that 11-year-olds should not be having sex is probably the biggest, but also 11-year-old girls should not be pursuing relationships with 19-year-olds, and parents should be responsible for teaching their children morality/responsibility and acceptable behavior. While the culture is definitely a factor in this story, it cannot be "blamed" for what's happened. The grandmother with whom the child is living (her parents are in Spain) says that it is tradition for their girls to have children and marry young, but admits that her granddaughter is too young. The average marriage age in their particular area is 14. One of the most horrifying thing in the story is that the girl claims that she did not even know how to become pregnant. I find this difficult to believe, but if it is true, then it most definitely should not be. If a girl is capable of getting pregnant, she should know how reproduction works.
As far as the father goes, while it seems to me that simply not having sex with people you meet on school playgrounds would be a safe and reasonable approach, barring that, 19-year-olds must be responsible for verifying the age of their partners. This girl does not look 11, she looks closer to 16, which is above the age of consent in that country, but the way she looks does not change her actual age. All of that being said, this whole situation would be avoided if people could control themselves enough to marry before having sex.
All of this being said, the reason I really felt like responding to this story was that the comments on some of the articles were as horrific as the articles themselves. One person marked the darkness of the child's skin, then went on to talk about more and less evolved races, comparing "less evolved races" to weeds which breed more quickly than cultivated, "more evolved plants." I felt like I was reading something out of Nazi Germany. Before today, I really was under the impression that fascism was a thing of the past, and yet there it was staring me in the face. This was not the only comment of its kind, but most of the others were less obvious about their racism. Most targeted gypsies and culture instead of skin color. Another commenter cried out against Americans who saw this as a case of statutory rape and a terrible tragedy when, as (s)he said that the same case happening in the US with a black girl would be seen as her trying to live off the government.
I don't believe any of those arguments have any grounds in this story. These commenters are coming to the story with preconceived notions about the world and the way it works and the injustices of it all and the things that people are doing wrong, and then they are using the story to voice their thoughts about completely different issues. Until people are able to come to a case without their own agendas, comment boards will be a place where extremists voice opinions that make Americans look like self-righteous fascists, and that horrifies me.
Last off, I would like to say that I don't believe the couple in this story is cursed or destined to have a miserable life. The father in question seems sincerely, if naively, determined to improve the condition of his very young family. Both parties are professedly in love. Both express love for their new child, and the father has high hopes for her future: “I want Violeta to be educated, to be able to read and write. She was born famous and maybe she will stay famous like becoming a doctor who invents brilliant medicine or saves lives." I sincerely hope that this family can retain that determination, that they will educate their daughter in ways that they should have been educated themselves, and that she does someday become a brilliant physician...or whatever else she may want to be.
Article from NY Daily News
Video and Wedding Pics on YouTube
Wednesday, October 14, 2009
Thoughts on Grand Central Station
About three weeks ago, I moved about three blocks west to a new building. As a result, I now take the 4/5 line to school instead of the 2/3. I still get off at 42nd street, but instead of surfacing at Time Square, I now come up through Grand Central Terminal. The day I started my new route, I was in a hurry, and while I new, in theory, where I was, I paid little attention. I found the quickest way to the street, and I jetted to class. But on my way home, I had plenty of time to look around and soak in my surroundings.I tried not to look like a tourist--I dread attracting negative attention, and no one likes it when a tourist stops in the walkway for no reason, gawking at what you see everyday, tripping you up when you're just trying to get home. So I looked up casually and saw for the first time the ceiling covered in stars. It wasn't what I expected. It looks nothing like Hogwarts. Instead of midnight blue, it's more of a turquoise color, really more green than blue if you ask me.
The constellations are depicted as though someone had played connect the dots on the ceiling, and while it sounded terribly romantic in theory, practice left me a bit cold. Last summer I read "Gone to New York" by Ian Frazier, a collection of essays, in which Frazier talks about taking a tour of Grand Central and a tour guide who complains that there are mylar balloons on the ceiling that have been there for ages and he can't figure out a way to get them down. In the essay, Frazier and a friend retrieve the pesky balloons using a device they created for removing plastic bags from trees. I looked for balloons on the ceiling, but they must have gotten them all.
I can't really say that I was disappointed. The building is absolutely gorgeous. The four-sided clock in the main concourse is supposedly worth somewhere between $10 and $20 million. The clock on the 42nd street facade is one of the oldest examples of Tiffany glass, and the sculptures surrounding the clock comprise the largest sculptural group in the world. It is a building of superlatives, but I found little to connect to, nothing I could laugh at. I have little use for things I cannot laugh at. Luckily, Wikipedia shares the following tidbit about the ceiling:
"There are two peculiarities to this ceiling: the sky is backwards, and the stars are slightly displaced. [...] When they learned that the ceiling was painted backwards, the embarrassed Vanderbilt family tried to explain that the ceiling reflected God's view of the sky."

Who can help but smirk at an embarrassed Vanderbilt?
Sidenote: One of my favorite things in Grand Central, apart from walking through the main concourse and feeling incredibly small, is a pastry shop called "Hot and Crusty." I've never stopped there, but I love the tenacity of the name, and if I ever do go in, it will most likely be out of amusement, and not merely appetite.
Thursday, May 28, 2009
You'll make it . . .



Mount Rubidoux is a hill which marks the boundary between Riverside, the city where I live, and Rubidoux (roo-bi-doe), it's less reputable neighbor. At just over thirteen hundred feet, the hill is quite sizable, but is by no means the mountain its name might conjure up in the imagination of one who has never seen it.
My grandmother's house sits right at the foot of this hill, with the third tier of her back yard backing the trail that climbs it. As a child, I went up and down that hill more times than I could hope to count. Some of my earliest, and haziest, memories take place there. I can remember walking up with my dad, right after he and my mom divorced. I remember climbing into the tower on the Fourth of July, with cousins who were some of my closest friends before time and distance inevitably weakened the bonds between us. I remember, too, slipping and sliding down the side of the mountain behind my older and more courageous brothers, as they ran straight down, occasionally glancing back to see whether I was still alive, and threatening to leave me behind...
This Monday, Memorial Day, finding myself at home with nothing to do, I became increasingly restless. After trying for some time to find some diversion, I resolved to go for a walk up the hill that's such a familiar part of my life. I could find no one else to accompany me, so I was alone on this particular trek, which isn't all that unusual. I climbed the hill, Found my favorite rock (one shaped kind of like a chair) overlooking the city airport, and watched the planes take off for a while, then began my descent.
When I was about halfway down, I passed a fairly sizable crowd of people walking up. By chance, I caught the eye of a woman of about 65. She was somewhat withered, but still spry, and as she looked up at me, she said, "You'll make it," and smiled.
I probably smiled back, but I was too shocked to know for sure. What was she talking about? Hadn't I already made it? I was on my way down. She was the one with hard work ahead of her, not me. Did I really look so worn out, even after resting for half an hour, that there was some concern as to whether I'd make it to the bottom all right?
Or was she talking to herself? Old people do that all the time, and crazy people too, for that matter (or so I hear). Was her encouraging remark one aimed at herself and simply projected onto me? I'm certain at this point that I'll never know, but as I reflect upon the experience, I must admit that at some point I thought of her as some kind of soothsayer, telling me that I would make it, not only down the mountain, but in some larger pursuit. I'm still hoping she was right.
Friday, December 26, 2008
I guess in some ways it's more like a job interview than anything else--an interview directed by the person who held the job initially, and knows precisely what it takes. Most of the scholarships I applied for were funded by people who had little idea what I would really be doing, and I could generalize my interests to the point that they sounded impressive without necessarily being concrete or realistic. It was like selling a new computer to 65-year-old woman who couldn't tell a mac from a pc. Now it's like my customer is computer science major, working for Intel, and no matter what I say, I'm bound to embarrass myself.
Friday, December 5, 2008
April is the Cruelest Month?
In the case of my name, this belief held true. Three years before I was born, as the story is told, my mother decided that she wanted a baby girl born in April, named April Rose, and her mind was set on it. Knowing you were a planned baby is worse, in some ways, than knowing you were an accident, I think. My mother once told me that on the night of my conception, she and my dad were fighting, but she had a plan and she had to carry it through. I could have been spared that story. The doctors induced labor on April 1st, April Fool’s Day, and I literally flipped. I was breech, and was born by cesarean the next day.
While my mother was healing from the surgery, my father was left to fill out the birth certificate, and a few days later I left the hospital as Mary Elizabeth Osborn. Her plan, so carefully undertaken, and successful up until the moment that the pen hit that paper, had been shattered. I can imagine the disgust she must have felt when she found out. What I can’t imagine is how my father didn’t know that I was supposed to be named April. If she had really been planning for three years, it doesn’t seem possible that she could have forgotten to mention the fact. Did they never discuss my name before my mom went into the hospital? Or, more abhorrent, did my father know and name me Mary anyway? My parents were divorced about three and a half years later, and I can’t help but think that this mishap, whether oversight or intentional insult, was an early indication of what was coming.
When they went to pick my sister, Lisa, up from Brownies later that week, the pre-pubescent girls gathered around me, prodding me with their sticky little fingers, and one of the girls inevitably asked my name. That’s when my mother finally burst into tears as she wailed, “Mary!”
Mary’s not a terrible name. I’ve known a Mary or two in my lifetime, and without exception I’ve found them to be more than passably pleasant. But I am not a Mary. After the Brownies outburst, my mom and dad went back to the hospital and changed the name on the birth certificate. Mom and Dad compromised, perhaps one of the last compromises in their failing marriage, and I now bear the name April Elizabeth Osborn.
I hated the name April as a kid—though not as much as I secretly, quietly disdained the name Mary. I hated that it’s the name of a month, and that the first thing most people ask when they learn my name is “Were you born in April?” and that the first thing they ask when they find out that I was, in fact, born in April is “Is that why your parents named you April?” I hated it when boys chanted “April is a fool!” every April first while I was in elementary school.
But the name’s grown on me. Twenty-plus years will do that for you. In my sophomore year of college, when I started speaking Spanish with one of my roommates, it was only natural for my name to become Abril, which flows better in Spanish than the English version. It was only after being called this for a year that I realized an old friend who had autographed a shirt for me once had made it out to Aprile, not misspelling my name, but translating it to Italian, his language of preference. My affection for my name, and by extension for my mother, has grown with my realization of its versatility.
According to an online encyclopedia (Wikipedia), “The derivation of the name (Latin Aprilis) is uncertain,” it could mean “to open,” alluding to springtime, or it could be derived from Aphrodite since it is traditional to name months after gods.
So I could be one who opens, or one who is open, to situations or people. By definition I cannot be closed-minded. I cannot dress in black too often, as this would go against the illusion to springtime, and I cannot be completely and utterly plain as my name is related to the goddess of love, lust, and beauty. But there is uncertainty in the derivation, so I could be all of the above, and if I were, would it be surprising? If I were a gothic girl of less than average beauty and singularly stubborn in my views, would anyone look twice? Would anyone look once? Or would they all look the other way? Would it all make more sense if my name were Mary?
I’m none of these. Or at least, I like to think that I’m not. I dress in gray more often than black, but pink, blue, and even green, all have a place in my closet. I won’t pretend to have the beauty of Aphrodite, but I do pride myself in my openness. But until I wrote this essay, I never associated that pride with my name, nor do I really now. Still, I can’t shake the feeling that if my mother had been a little less emotional, if she hadn’t cared quite so much, or if my father had been a little more stubborn, I might have turned out a completely different person. When friends hear this story for the first time, they screw up their faces and say “you don’t look anything like a Mary,” whatever that means. If the story were reversed, they would probably say the same thing about April, and I have to wonder whether Mary would have molded to me, or I to Mary. But at the end of the day, I’m just me.
(April 2008)
